|
We begin in Petrified Wood: Part II, with plant
matters. From the microscopic cell
structures to macroscopic grain patterns, our search today favors paleobotany. As
certain
lapidary processes bring out these structures for our perusal, we will add these to our
cache of
last months feature.
With an
international eye on our worlds paleoforests, we will travel the globe in search
of petrified wood itself, and some cultural lore that surrounds it. We will touch
upon the
metaphysical briefly, but will base ourselves in the concrete science of evolving plant
forms
over time. Our evolution will take us to Pangea, and its subsequent
proto-continents,
China, Brazil, Antarctica, and places better known for sighting our logged quandary.
So, pack your
hard hats and safety sunglasses. Were off to explore collections of trunked
wonders worldwide. Lets go!
Introduction
Good morning,
everyone! I hope you are bright-eyed, bushy-tailed, and excited to depart,
as we are leaving in a few minutes. No need for airline tickets, since we will board
our clubs
charter flight to points all over. Please grab your backpacks and all aboard, while
I get the
morning beverage and in-flight lesson prepared.
Our itinerary
will list the places we will visit. They include: Argentina, Brazil, Antarctica!
All of our club
gear is already stowed, per our captain. We have everything from sunscreen
to winter parkas, for our comfort and convenience!
Flying from our
local New Castle County Airport, we will cross the Pacific Ocean to Asia,
then on to frozen Antarctica. To thaw out, we'll stop at sunny Australia, and next
to Africa and
South America. In between, we will hit Europe, and other spots on the globe.
As weve
had our primer on petrified wood, todays interactive discussion will feature plant
biology, and its changes over time. We wont be able to cover all of geologic
time, but will hit
upon a representation of many parts of the scale, depending on the locales well be
visiting.
Well cover
lapidary, and the other subjects on successive jaunts on our voyage. Are you
ready? Lets go!
Paleobotany
and botany have one thing in common; they both use scientific names in the
same manner. According the Linnean system of taxonomy, set down by Carolus Linnaeus
some time ago in 18th century Sweden. He based his work on upon a hierarchy in which
living
things can be categorized in an ascending/descending order, per their similar features.
Latin is used
here, so a working knowledge of rootwords can help, but is not necessary to
begin with. Just by rote learning a few names, we can jump start our exposure into
another
language
His system
goes: Kingdom, Phylum (Division for plants), Class, Order, Family, Genus,
Species, with the first categories being the most general (Kingdom: Animal, Plant).
Modern
scientists have developed the system that he popularized.[i]
Today, the International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (ICBN), set forth by the
International Botanical Congress, outlines the taxonomic designations that we will use in
our article. Three major differences are the addition of Domain before Kingdom,
sub-
designations to every step, and Variety and Form below Species,
for plants.[ii]
We will focus
upon trees, and refer here on in to Genus/Species only, if no other
hierarchy is required to differentiate an argument. An example from last months article
is: Araucarioxylon arizonicum.
It is
interesting to note that Linnaeus had originally designated three Kingdoms:
Plants, Animals, and Minerals. I wonder into which category would he position
petrified
wood? We shall place it in Kingdom Plantae.
I list a a few,
representative (to this article), in a mix of fossil, extinct, and modern tree
classifications below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLANTAE (Plants)
"Gymnosperms"
(Spermatophytes, or seed plants)
Conifers
---Araucariaceae
---Cephalotaxaceae
---Cheirolepidaceae
---Cupressaceae (redwoods & junipers)
---Pinaceae (pines, cedars, firs, etc)
---Podocarpaceae
---Sciadopityaceae
---Taxaceae (yews)
---Voltziales (basal conifers)
Cycadales
(cycads)
---Cycadaceae
---Stangeriaceae
---Zamiaceae
Ginkgoales
(ginkgos)
Glossopteridales
Lyginopterids (earliest
seed plants)[iii]
Photos by and
courtesy of:
Fossil Araucaria cone, Steve Ervin
Modern Pine cone and Sweet-gum seedpod, Ken Casey
©2006
|
|
Modern pine cone |
|
Fossil Araucaria
cone |
Sweet-gum seedpod,
A Tertiary relict
|
|
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/help/taxaform.html |
|
|
|
Where is petrified wood?
Anywhere that there was a forest,
tree, or wood set within conditions conducive towards
mineralization, there may lie under our feet petrified wood. As we understand the
basic
sedimentary principle of one layer of rock-forming material covering over another over
time,
we can surmise that many of the paleoforests of time lie some feet under our boots. Active
geologies over eons have exposed our mineral woods for our exploration. It is these
visible
features that we will access this trip. We will leave the big digs for
another article. Except
for some hot weather, we wont even have to break a sweat. Isnt that
cool?!
Before we go, lets review:
There are three main steps towards
permineralization of living plant matter: (1.) encapsulation,
or removal from an environment that causes decomposition, (2.) introduction of sufficient
quantity
of a mineral-laden solution to bring about chemical-biochemical replacement of cell
structure,
and (3.) time. Our global search takes us to many places, so keep your eyes peeled!
Lets talk
about Pangea, the ancient supercontinent which is the starting place for continental
drift in our chapter on paleobotany. Well need a little history to ramp us up
to speed.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Drawing courtesy of the
University of Texas |
|
Fossilized Coral
Photo by Ken Casey ©2006 |
As an avid
student of geology at Edinburgh University, Charles Darwin became embroiled in
the great geological debates of the 1820s and 1830s. Darwin received acclaim not
only by his
later works as a biologist, but as a geologist, as well. Darwin's most
successful application of
simple geology and his most lasting contribution to the science was his explanation of the
origin
of coral reefs. (They build up on the sides of slowly subsiding seamounts.)[iv]
Though he could
not successfully build upon Lyells work directly beyond this marine theory,
his geographic explorations aboard The Beagle pushed his focus to biology. His
highly
controversial theory of evolution paved the way for us to now understand more on our
changing
landscape of petrified wood. We can combine biology and geology into an earth
science that
supports our studies here. We will begin with his conclusions upon return from his
grand
adventure.
As similar
species covered the single landmass, when broken apart, some went with each
continent. As Darwin noted that isolated populations are likely to speciate,
subspeciate, or
evolve, a similar process is purported by many of todays scientists when Pangea
separated
into Laurasia and Gondwanaland. That process is known as vicariation. Examples
are the
creatures of the Galapagos Islands, and those of Australia versus those lineages of
Eurasia
and the Americas.
|

Modern Gingko biloba leaves
Photo courtesy of Reinhard Kraasch
|
|
These flora and fauna adapted to their environment, as both climate
and ecosystems altered over time. His mantra survival of the fittest
describes the successfully altered progeny extant in each step of evolution, and moreso,
those who are alive today. Today, we call it adaptive radiation.
Many trees of
the fossil record survive relict today, such as Gingko biloba, which eminated
from China in the Jurassic, some 160 million years ago.[v] |
|
Though it
has done so with little or no change, it did survive; whereas, many co-existing
species did not. It was, and is, the fittest. This example would also support
the newer theory
spurts and stasis. This dicot gymnosperm (twin-leafed deriving from naked, or
fruitless, seed),
native to China, can be found in yards, parks, and preserves for us to enjoy.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Cycad seed
Photo courtesy
of Steve Ervin |
|
Glossopteris,
Antarctica
Photo courtesy of Dr. Bernie Gunn |
|
Psaronius,
extinct tree fern,
Late Carboniferous-Permian
Photo courtesy of Steve Ervin |
Some
species did not. They are extinct. There are many examples: Glossopterids,
Psaronius,
and Cordaites are but a few.
The Cycads are
still here, though todays palm trees (Genus: Cycas) are believed to have
some relation to Gingkos, perhaps in an anagenetic lineage,as they are both
spermatophytes.
The extinct genus Cordaites is structurally somewhat between Cycads and Gingkos.
The
Cordaites lineage can be traced back to Late Paleozoic times.
Glossopteris,
a bald cypress-like tree, is believed to have covered all of today's continents
at one time. Psaronius lived as a great tree-fern from the Carboniferous
until the Late Permian.
Five major
extinction events can be marked on the geologic time line. The Devonian marked
one of them. At about 364 mya, most of the great fishes disappeared. This
event, marked by
the Frasnian-Famennian boundary, does not greatly defeat the land plants. In fact,
the
megafloras success may have been the catalyst to marine faunal extinctions.
By understanding
the Carbon
Cycle, we can appreciate that the greenhouse gas CO2
used up by the burgeoning plant community reduced atmospheric levels, thus generating a
global cooling. The resulting glaciation may have chilled the oceans too much for
the great
cold-blooded fishes to survive. As usual, the generalist species survived to adapt
and swim
on.[vi] The
remainder of the organic carbon became deposited on and in the ground, to
eventually be metamorphosed into coal and peat.
Todays
fossil and paleoclimatological evidence points to mass extinctions. Though
this puts a dent into the Snowball
Earth theory, massive environment changes seemed
to have produced modified groups of species. Cold-hardy trees could have weathered
this
eonic storm.
Could this have been the dawning
time of evergreens and deciduous winter-sleepers?
In the Permian (290-248 mya), drier inland conditions may have caused adaptations in
plants,
such as the introduction of angiosperms (seed-bearing trees).
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Modern Pine tree |
|
Modern pine cone |
|
Modern Pine tree bark |
Photos by Ken Casey
©2006
|
Also, the great
forests of fern-like plants shifted to gymnosperms, plants
with their
offspring enclosed within seeds. Modern conifers, the most familiar gymnosperms of today,
first appear in the fossil record of the Permian.[vii]
The transitional Triassic (248-206
mya) supports recovery of plant biota after a mass
extinction. The holdovers included the lycophytes, glossopterids,
and dicynodonts. While
those that went on to dominate the Mesozoic world include modern conifers, cycadeoids,
and the dinosaurs.[viii] Plant
and insect taxa exploded in numbers, during the Triassic.
The Jurassic (206-144 mya) was overtaken by lush ferns and palm-type cycads. Early
seed plants, they still exist today.[ix]
Pangea began to break-up in the Jurassic, which
contributed to mass vicariation, based
upon hemisphere (northern, southern), and climate change. With the dawn of the
Cretaceous
(144-65 mya), many of the lifeforms (especially trees) we know today lived then.
 |
|
For example, todays beech forests of New Zealand took root in the
Mid-Cretaceous. With the advent of pollen and seed plants(angiosperms),
recolonization of desolate areas took place. Before that, in the Early Cretaceous
(~135 mya) Gondwanian flowering plants, such as the kauri (mentioned in Petrified
Wood, Part I), arrived on the islands. (Left): Petrified Beech wood, polished slab
Photo permission courtesy of the Iron Hill Museum
Newark, Delaware (From their display case at our March 4-5, 2006 Show) |
Among the first angiosperms to reach New Zealand was the wind-pollinated southern
beech tree (Nothofagus species). It arrived between 80 and 110 million years ago, after
New
Zealand had separated from the Australian part of Gondwana, but before it had separated
from the Antarctic region. For several million years, the beech forests stretched
continuously
from Tasmania, and through what is now New Zealand and Marie Byrd Land in Antarctica, on
into South America. Even today, the beech forests of New Zealand and South America
resemble each other so closely that each has the same parasitic fungi, mosses and
flightless
sucking bugs inhabiting their bark (Stevens et al., 1995).[x]
|

Lepidodendron aculeatum trunk fragment
Photo courtesy of wikipedia.org
|
|
Abbreviated
Timeline of Tree Evolution
410 mya Vascular plants (Early Devonian)
380 mya Cone-bearing Gymnosperms (Late
Devonian)
135 mya Angiosperms (flowering plants)
(Early Cretaceous) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In ancient
Europe, now England, a Cretaceous to Jurassic paleoforest looms. There were
cypress, junipers, and cycadophytes, some similar to those of the Mediterranean
today.
The Fossil Forest, west of Lulworth Cove, Dorset, southern England, is a classic
geological
locality with the remains and moulds of late Jurassic or early Cretaceous coniferous trees
rooted in a palaeosol (ancient soil), the Great Dirt Bed. Above the trees is stromatolitic
limestone and over this the unusual Broken Beds, a limestone breccia that was originally
evaporitic.[xi]
Nearby, at
Fossil Forest at Victoria Park in Glasgow, Scotland Lepidodendron
tree stumps
can be found in their original growth positions. Otherwise known as the scale
tree from the
Greek, it was deposited during the carboniferous in sandstone.[xii]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Araucaria
|
|

Araucaria with
Turedo burrows
|
|
|
KBC: |
|
Steve, you have recently retired as a Biology/Zoology Professor Emeritus at
California State University (CSU) Fresno. Your stated areas of interest and research are
in Avian ecology, island ecology, and passerine population dynamics. How has your work in
these areas guided you towards an interest in evolution and paleontology? |
|
|
SE: |
|
My interest in evolution and paleontology predates my degrees. I had
an exceptional HS Biology Teacher in the 60's. One of the areas for my Ph.D. examinations
was avian paleontology and my Ph.D. dissertation was in avian ecology/behavior.
|
|
|
KBC: |
|
You visited the Galapagos Islands in 1983-84 and 1987. What did you find there?
Oh, by the way, Happy Darwin Day <http://darwinday.org/englishL/home/index.html?>!
(February 12th) |
|
|
SE: |
|
Actually I have been to Galapagos in 82-83, 87, and 90. The 1987
trip was a sabbatical and I worked on Large-billed Flycatchers and Dark-billed Cuckoos.
The studies just developed basic information on relatively little known species. I lived
in Puerto Ayora on Santa Cruz for 4 months. Galapagos is a wonderful place to see
evolution in action, plus it is the Mecca for biologists. Too few people truly
"see" Galapagos unless they live there and travel from island to island.
Differences in the features of a species are visible when you go from one island to the
next. I have been to most of the places Darwin visited...an exceptional experience when
combined with later visits to his home in London. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
When teaching evolution with petrified wood as a tool, what would be a
representative example you use, and why? |
|
|
SE: |
|
I have taught evolution for 32 years...plus some teaching as a
graduate student. It is the ONLY way that science views the world. Any other way is not
science and is usually an oxymoron. My wood collection is only a fraction of what I
presented, but I emphasized distribution of fossil forms to illustrate such principles as
continental drift. I usually used Araucaria, Ginkgo, and Glossopteris
as examples. Of course the first two still exist and have interesting distributions. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
Have you found that fossil plant evidence has had an influence in your work as a
Biologist/Zoologist? Or, have the two interests evolved divergently? |
|
|
SE: |
|
The answer would be convergence rather than divergence. Plant
ecology/paleontology goes hand-in-hand with animal ecology/paleontology.
|
|
|
KBC: |
|
You name your personal homepage Corvus. Is that after the generic
name for crows, ravens, and jays? Has the study of their evolution been a profound
influence on you? Or, do you just like these passerine birds? |
|
|
SE: |
|
Corvids are considered one of the most "advanced" of the
passerine birds. They are incredibly intelligent and even use tools in some cases. While I
did not work with them, I have always been intrigued and impressed with them...they are
among my favorites. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
Our article attempts to link the first perching birds found in China with certain
species of fossil trees. The attempt is to suggest a picture with our supposed
paleo-view as a mind tool to grasp a better perspective, like on TV. I use the
example of either Microraptor (feathered dinosaur) or Archaeopteryx
(proto-bird) as potentially being able to perch upon the Gingko tree. As a new
bird to this branch of science, would my supposition be remotely plausible? (Of
course, outside the scope of this article, I would need to find evidence for and conduct
research concluding as such.) Or, what flora might these creatures have perched upon, if
any? |
|
|
SE: |
|
Most illustrations use cycads as dominant trees during the Jurassic
and Cretaceous. Ginkgo was apparently present around Solnhofen in Germany. I would guess
it was in China as well. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
You picture on your personal website a fossil Glossopteris leaf. (Have you used
this tree in support of Continental Drift? |
|
|
SE: |
|
Absolutely...although it is only one small shred of a vast amount of
evidence. Continental drift is now considered a fact...not a theory. This is just the same
for evolution...it is also a FACT. The theory is "Natural Selection"....how the
fact works. People usually get this wrong as we tend to shorten the phrase: Darwin's
Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection" (correct) to just "Darwin's
Theory" (incorrect). Both Evolution and Continental Drift can be DIRECTLY
measured...there are parallels here. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
You wrote a paper, titled Human
Ecology: Biology, Evolution, Environment. Where could I find it, and what was
the major point(s) you argued on Evolution? |
|
|
SE: |
|
This is not a paper...it was the title of a course I taught for over
20 years. It covered human evolution and other aspects of human ecology both in the past
and now. One of the topics I never covered was Creation Science...except to illustrate why
it is not scientific. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
What order would you say your interests developed in these areas: biology,
ornithology, or paleobotany (petrified wood)? |
|
|
SE: |
|
I can't put these in any order as some are inclusive of others. Both
ornithology and paleontology are branches of biology (and also geology). I am a very
broadly trained biologist with a wide range of evolutionary interests. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
As a collector of minerals, fossils, and petrified wood, when did it become a
hobby for you? |
|
|
SE: |
|
Sometime in the late 1950's. I started collecting things as a kid
usually does. My interests grew from there. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
Are there any works or resources that you would like to suggest our readers check
out regarding petrified wood and/or evolution? |
|
|
SE: |
|
There are too many to actually list. On the web: Talk Origins
Archive, UC Berkeley Paleo Dept, Pharyngula, Olduvai George, Down House etc. etc. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
Are there any suggestions that you would like to offer students of life science,
earth science, or of evolution? |
|
|
SE: |
|
It
is absolutely essential that people understand that all of biology and medicine are
based on Evolution. It is a FACT. It really troubles me that so few people in this country
understand that... and instead prefer religious and mystic views. To be a biologist
REQUIRES that you understand and work in an evolutionary context...anything else is a
throwback to the Dark Ages. You can be a religious person and an evolutionist...you just
cannot mix the two. |
|
|
KBC: |
|
Have you any additional comments? |
|
|
SE: |
|
Just to thank you for the opportunity to express some views!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plants and trees
have developed over time, giving us rich history to explore. Charles Darwin,
noted naturalist, assumed a gradual modification over generations of descendants; whereas,
some modern biologists work with the premise of bursts of changes, then periods of stasis
(punctuated equilibrium). Mass extinctions and long episodes of statis seem to
support the
latter theory. One could assume that with pseudoextinction, an example being the
recognition
of modern birds as the dinosaurs descendants, that dinosaurs must today exist;
however, in a
different form.
Darwin received
acclaim not only as a biologist, but as a geologist, as well. So, his eye for
our current subject matter could guide us in our basic understanding of how trees
(evidenced
by petrified wood) have changed over geologic time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
It will also be helpful for us to learn "morphology" (tree parts) and some
biology. Dont worry, just enough to aid us in identifying on species from
another. For example, xylem,
phloem, and bark, cambium, precambium, etc. In vascular plants,
xylem is one of the two types of transport tissue in plants, phloem being the other one.
The word xylem is derived from classical Greek
xúlon, "wood", and indeed the best known xylem tissue is wood. The xylem transports sap
from the root up the plant: xylem sap consists mainly of water and inorganic ions,
although it can contain a number of organic chemicals as well.[xiii] It is most likely one development that
encouraged or supported gigantism.
(Left): Tree Anatomy in cross-section |
|
Water and
nutrient uptake is key to survival of plants. Xylem appeared early in the
history
of terrestrial plant life. Fossil plants with anatomically preserved xylem are known from
the
Silurian (more than
400 million years ago), and trace fossils resembling individual xylem cells
may be found in earlier Ordovician rocks.[xiv]
Food is handled
by the phloem. In vascular plants, phloem is the living tissue
that carries
organic nutrients, particularly sucrose, to all parts of the plant where needed. In trees, the phloem
is part of the bark, hence
the name, derived from the Greek word for "bark".[xv]
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Petrified
Gymnosperm wood radial-section |
|
Petrified dicot
wood cross-section |
|
Dicot petrified
wood cross-section |
| Photomicrograph
slides by and courtesy of John D. Curtis, Nels R. Lersten, and Michael D. Nowak ©2002 |
The
vascular cambium is a lateral meristem: The vascular cambium is the source of both
the secondary
xylem (inwards) and the secondary phloem (outwards), and hence is located
between these tissues in the stem. The vascular cambium usually consist of two types of
cells:
- Fusiform initials (tall cells, axially-oriented)
- Ray initials (almost isodiametric cells - smaller and round to
angular in shape)
Vascular cambium is a part of the plant's meristem - series of
tissues consisting of embryonic
(incompletely differentiated) cells from which other (and more differentiated) plant tissues
originate.[xvi]
We will cover such tree groups as:
Angiosperms (deciduous), Gymnosperms (coniferous),
Cycads, and extinct fossil trees.
To get our inquisitive engines
going, Ill ask if anyone knows what is believed to have been
the first tree?
Thats right: Archaeopteris
(~370 mya), a
Progymnosperm.
Now that
weve covered how our petrified trees evolved and got placed over geologic time,
we are ready to go over plant anatomy. Well need to know their parts (living
and fossil), if we
are going to be successful in identifying different species in the field.
Lets start
with the basics. Many fossil trees, like modern trees, have branches, trunks,
and roots. We can easily identify these major parts as tree-like. Grain
pattern have been
preserved in many specimens, thus aiding us in our comparson to modern woods.
The colorful
concentric rings comprising the trunks log structure also aid us. Sometimes,
we have clues deposited nearby, such as leaf impressions, fossilized seeds, cones, or
amber.
Even remnants of insect infestation, as in Mesozoic Antarctic woods can help. You might
even
remember your high school biology class lesson on plants and trees. The key
elements of a
tree are: xylem, phloem, cambium
"
If that
doesnt bring it back, well, lets try a picture. Take a look above at the tree in
cross-section.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Pressure-treated Pine
wood-grain |
|
Petrified gymnosperm wood
cross-section |
|
Petrified gymnosperm wood
radial-section |
Photomicrograph
slides by and courtesy of John D. Curtis, Nels R. Lersten, and Michael D. Nowak ©2002
P-T Pine photo by Ken Casey ©2006 |
After,
well go into some advanced stuff, like plant stones, and such. A
plant stone
(or Phytolith) serves to add structural stability to plants. These microscopic
bodies can be
made from silicon or calcium oxalate. In paleobotany, these phytoliths often remain
behind,
serving as fossil evidence in identifying ancient flora. A relationship between
these plants
and fossil herbivores can be forged. From this evidence, changes in extinct animal
diets,
and their resulting evolutions, can be measured and compared. The chief faunal
evidence is
found within coprolites. It is interesting to note that Charles Darwin mentioned
plant stones
in his writings.[xvii]
About 75%
of flowering plants produce calcium oxalate crystals in some or all of their organs.
Because these crystals occur in various shapes and hydration states that are specific and
consistent within each organ, they have been used periodically as an internal taxonomic
character. Since crystals and their macropatterns are usually retained in the mature
leaves
and stems even after they die or drop off the plant, such information should be useful for
identification purposes, possibly in forensics.[xviii]
 |
|
 |
Development of the calcium
oxalate crystal macropattern in pomegranate
(Punica granatum, Punicaceae)
Photo by and courtesy of Harry T. Horner |
|
Modern Plum
(Genus: Prunus)
Photo by Ken Casey ©2006
Note: After having taken this picture, I promptly consumed
the plum for my lunch. Then, I got back to writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Botanical Terms:
Dendochronology, paleosol, paleopalynology (fossil pollen),
eco-morphology, megaflora,
leaf physiognomy, are all terms for us to learn in our study of paleobotany. Well be
visiting
some of these terms in our quest to learn more about Petrified Wood!
Photomicrograph slide by and courtesy of Curtis, Lersten,
and Nowak ©2002 |
|

Petrified angiosperm wood, radial-section
showing the tyloses in the vessel
|
|
When paleontologists and
paleobotanists study and reconstruct lifeforms over evolutionary
time, they require a context, called phylogeny. This biological context
connects groups of
organisms by ancestor/descendant relationships. Extinct organisms,
fossil forms of those
today extant, and living trees require a structure to show how they are interrelated,
called a
cladogram.
This genealogy of species can be
ensconced in field of systematics. Taxonomic science,
or the naming and classifying of lifeforms, underlies the study of these relationships.[xix]
If you would like to know more, UC
Berkeley offers some resources:
Journey
Into Phylogenetic Systematics
Phylogenetics Resources
Introduction to Cladistics
When making a phylogenetic
analysis of organisms, say Gingko biloba, the best modern
acceptable method is cladisitics. Cladistics is a particular
method of hypothesizing
relationships among organisms.[xx]
The basis for cladistics are
synapomorphies, or the shared derived characteristics of
organisms compared.[xxi]
Another example of applying
phylogenetics in paleobotany is the contention to accept
a pre-Silurian plant record. By studying the microfossil evidence of cyrptospores,
Professor
Wilson A. Taylor of the University of Wisconsin at Eau-Claire in his paper, The case
for a
land flora in the Cambrian - ultrastructural evidence, proposes this hypothesis as a
pivotal
evolutionary event.[xxii]
Some Paleobotany being conducted
today I have recently perused an abstract on a
presentation on Miocene Maryland fossil endocarp (nut shell) evidence. There are
scads
of resources for paleontologists and paleobotanists. I will list a few at the end of the
article,
many of which were presentations at the 2004 and 2005 Botany Conferences. Some current
work by botanists have literally unearthed aspects on paleoenvironments for our modern
reconstruction upon the fossil record. The gamut here runs from plant forms
surviving
extinction events, the earliest insect pollinations, paleoclimatic changes in temperate
Antarctica, and early proof of autumn leave color changes.
Beyond just taking a
paleo-snapshot of a fossil-forming environment, new volumes of data
have been plotted to demonstrate trends in climate change and evolution. For
example,
various paleogeographic reconstructions suggest that the climate warmed during the Late
Cretaceous partly due to accumulation of greenhouse gases.[xxiii]
 |
|
Inversand Greensand Mine, Sewell, New Jersey Our club's local collecting area encompasses these
fossil-laden sands at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) Boundary.
Photo by Ken Casey ©2005 |
Moreover, derived from
evidence about the differing chronostratigraphy surrounding the
Cretaceous-Teritiary Boundary (K-T) Event, the faunal and floral extinction dynamics
suggest a new interpretation. Professors W. A. Green and L. J. Hickey of Yale
University
offer that [t]his substantiates some of our standing assumptions about the
selectivity of
extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous, which may have eliminated taxa but do not seem
to have restructured plant ecosystems significantly. It provides an example of ecosystem
stability under environmental perturbation and highlights the influence of evolutionary
innovation on evolutionary history.[xxiv]
Some palynologists have proposed
that Middle Triassic cycads were insect pollinated,
like those today. They use fossil pollen and insect coprolites as evidence on these
gymnosperms (seed plants).[xxv]
Biologists at the University of
Kansas have presented on the topic of paleoclimate in
Permian-Triassic Antarctica:
Tree rings are well
preserved in Late Permian and Middle Triassic permineralized peats
from the central Transantarctic Mountains, and can be used as paleoclimate indicators.
During both of these time periods, the Earth had a greenhouse climate, with temperatures
in polar regions sufficient for plant growth. Previously there has not been much
paleoclimate
information obtained from Gondwana Triassic wood, and the permineralized material
represents an important source of data on growing conditions in Antarctica at this
time.[xxvi]
My favorite development is the
amazing preservation of leaf material from Idaho, which
shows us that Fall leaves did indeed change color seasonally some millions of years ago.
As,
an interesting correlation has been made between fossil and living tree genera from the
Late
Tertiary (~15 mya) in northern Idaho. Fossil foliage has been superbly well
preserved
[b]ecause of cold, anoxic bottom water and a high rate of sedimentation,
preservation of
the local biota was excellent. During the last 15 million years this area has
remained
tectonically stable, resulting in little post depositional change of any biota remains
trapped
in the sediments. Leaves often show original fall colors (brown, red, and yellow). Some
even
contain Chloroplasts and show the original green color. Biochemistry, unique in each
modern
genera of plant species correlates well with similar fossil species.[xxvii]
When we piece the paleo-puzzle
together, we can see trends of lifeform changes, known
as evolution. I will proffer an example that can bring a picture to our paleo-view
by building
upon an image most of us have witnessed in our lives: a bird perching upon a tree.
Our
question, How did he or she get here from a long travel over
generations? Lets find out.
Evolution: Dinosaurs, Birds, and Trees
Lets start from a certain
geologic point in time. About 550 mya, the Cambrian Explosion
occurred. Most of the major continents have moved into the southern hemisphere, thus
forming the supercontinent Pangea. First plants on land? They occurred at least 400 mya,
in the Early Paleozoic. Vascular plants (xylem, phloem, etc.) grew in by the
Silurian
(443-417 mya), then the Devonian (417-354 mya) brought about tree diversification.[xxviii]
The earliest trees occurred and
spread globally about 370 mya, as [t]rees evolved
some 180 million years after the Cambrian explosion when the land masses were mostly
south of the equator and Pangea had begun to form. Because the land masses were fairly
close together, the forests were able to spread across the land quite rapidly.[xxix]
The Devonian (410-360 mya) brought
about the rise of Archaeopteris, now believed
to be the earliest tree. Its eventual biotic provinces were Laurasia and Gondwana.
Its
upright growth and shallow roots took advantage of water and minerals more deeply
below the surface than its ancestors.[xxx] 3D Image of Archaeopteris
During the Carboniferous (360-286
mya), forests of lychophytes towered to greater
than 100 feet! These behemoth scale trees share the trait of being the first
vascular plants,
which still survive in albeit a relatively miniature form today. A differentiating
trait is in their
leaf structure. Lycophytes evolved separately as microphylls, which have
only a single
unbranched strand of vascular tissue, or vein, whereas megaphylls, found in other plants
with leaves, have multiple veins, usually branching one or more times within the
leaf.[xxxi]
The Division Lycopodiophyta
(sometimes called Lycophyta) is a tracheophyte
subdivision
of the Kingdom Plantae.
It is the oldest extant (living) vascular plant division and includes
some of the most "primitive" extant species. These species reproduce by shedding
spores
and have macroscopic alternation of generations, although some are homosporous while
others are heterosporous.
They differ from all other vascular plants in having microphylls,
leaves that have only a single vascular trace (vein) rather than the much more complex
megaphylls found in ferns and
seed plants.[xxxii]
Leading up to the Triassic Period
(248-206 mya), global climate change occurred at about
the time of Earths largest extinction event: the Permo-Triassic extinction.
On Pangea,
survivors included lycophytes
and glossopterids.
Typical Triassic tree flora included cycads
and conifers, along with ferns growing in the understory. Evolution prompted the
introduction
of ancestors to our modern conifers and cycadeoids. The glossopterids, however,
became
extinct by the end of the period. Dinosaurs, as we have traditionally known them,
also roamed
the planet, until the K-T Event.[xxxiii]
Triassic Mesophyta plants (middle
flora) of the Late Permian to Middle Cretaceous
included ever smaller lycopods, Calamites-type plants, and ferns. Variations
occurred,
according to climate and geography, such as giant seed ferns overtowering trees in part of
Gondwana. Whereas, cycads and gingkos inhabited drier, interior climes, such as in
northern Pangea. And, Araucariacean conifers were the predominate large trees
in
Laurasia, with primitive gingkoaleans (e.g. Sphenobaiera and Glossphyllum) and cycads
as lower story and underbrush.[xxxiv]
 |
|
 |
Chinese conifer (Petrified
Wood)
Photo by and courtesy of Steve Speer of
Sticks-in-stones.com ©2006 |
|
Calamites (Permian),
Brazil
Photo courtesy of Steve Ervin |
Before Trees and up to
Flight Before trees, there was moss and algae. Tree evolution
includes the development of a vascular system with roots. Dr. Robert Banner of Yale
University presented his findings at Earth Systems Processes, a multidisciplinary meeting
in Edinburgh, Scotland. It is hosted jointly by the Geological Society of London
(GSL) and
the Geological Society of America (GSA). His presentation, How trees changed the
world,
offers evidence of radical geological change deriving from such shifts in a new biota
ecosystem. He argues that changes in Earths atmosphere and the natural Carbon
Cycle
have been advanced. As we shall see:
The
first trees soaked up nutrients from rocks at a rate never before seen. This
enhanced the weathering of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) silicate minerals,
which in turn removed carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as Ca and Mg became
locked together with carbonate ions in lime-rich sediments in the worlds oceans.
The removal of CO2 from the atmosphere by this method and by increased
photosynthesis (fixation) led to atmospheric CO2 stabilising at lower levels than
the world had known for most of its previous 4200Ma history.[xxxv]
Increased erosion levels occurred from root-splitting, as trees took their nutrients from
rocks. The procress proceeds with wood lignin becoming buried into these
sediments.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide used up by these large plants led to proportional deposition
of removed carbon. Organic carbon is removed from the wood, thus becoming
coal. As
large plant photosynthesis advanced globally, greater percentages of atmospheric oxygen
occurred.
Enriched air brought about faunal evolution, in that gigantism took over for a bit of
geologic time. The early resulting insect populations became huge, compared to even
todays largest dragonfly, for example.[xxxvi]
It
wasnt long after (in millions of years), that pollinating insects helped spread
flowering
trees and plants conquer the globe. Dinosaurs, then birds perched in trees, or flew from
the
ground first. Both sides of the origin of flight debate still rage today.
The first tree-dwelling bird
(dinosaur descendent, Archaeopteryx) must have evolved after
trees. Or, when did the earliest avian perch on trees? The debate rages, whether avians
evolved from Mezozoic thecodonts, theropods, (or dinosaurs, at all). Still the
topical question
is, Which came first, the tree-dwelling dino, or the flight-adaptive
bird? Ornithologists differ
in opinion as to a ground flight or a tree flight origin.
Another question looms: Did flight
occur before trees evolved? If so, then the latter opinion on flight origin
could hold true.
Professor Gary Ritchison of Eastern Kentucky University, in his BIO554/754 Ornithology
Lecture Notes 1: Introduction to Birds, poses such questions.[xxxvii]
 |
|
 |
Archaeopteryx
(Artist's rendition)
Artwork by Luis V. Rey ©2003 |
|
Microraptor zhaoianus (Artist's
rendition)
Painting by | |